July302014
“This is fun. I’ve never had a party start out drunk before!” Our DM during our first session

(Source: outofcontextdnd)

July292014
teal-deer:

vaultedthewall:

dragonageconfessions:

Confession: I confess I worry I am a bigot. I know making love interests “playersexual” is intended to be inclusive and maximize options, that RPGs are largely about fantasy wish-fulfillment, and that my playthrough is not affected by anyone else’s. But knowing every potential love interest could go either way decreases my immersion because I know this is statistically uncommon. I preferred my party having a mix of orientations: it felt more real.
 

Repeat after me, OP: Four bisexual people in the same city is not less realistic than:
Dragons 
Magic that you can use to cause flame or ice or lightning fly from your fingertips 
Literal Demons
Literal Spirits that take possession of people
Elves that run around barefooted literally everywhere.
A culture that worships dogs using “bitch” as an insult
(seriously did NO ONE in the writer’s room raise their hand and go “Wait a second here maybe we should rethink this…”?)
An ancient order that uses the blood of corrupted monsters of an unknown sinister origin to allow them to fight said monsters better.
USING LAVA AS A LIGHT SOURCE WHERE YOU ARE IN AN ENCLOSED CAVE STANDING FIVE FEET AWAY FROM IT AND DOING JUST FINE.
GIANT FUCKING SPIDERS SERIOUSLY I AM TALKING HUMMER SIZED
Cutting people apart and stitching them back together frankenstein style and having that actually work.
Giant gray-skinned horned people.
So, yes, OP. If you’re going “The fact that four bisexuals are in the same city and also hang out together, THAT’S what breaks my immersion” you might want to rethink your priorities. Sorry, but them’s the breaks. 


Also bisexuals huddle together for warmth and travel in packs. So. Yeah.

teal-deer:

vaultedthewall:

dragonageconfessions:

Confession: I confess I worry I am a bigot. I know making love interests “playersexual” is intended to be inclusive and maximize options, that RPGs are largely about fantasy wish-fulfillment, and that my playthrough is not affected by anyone else’s. But knowing every potential love interest could go either way decreases my immersion because I know this is statistically uncommon. I preferred my party having a mix of orientations: it felt more real.

 

Repeat after me, OP: Four bisexual people in the same city is not less realistic than:

  1. Dragons 
  2. Magic that you can use to cause flame or ice or lightning fly from your fingertips 
  3. Literal Demons
  4. Literal Spirits that take possession of people
  5. Elves that run around barefooted literally everywhere.
  6. A culture that worships dogs using “bitch” as an insult
  7. (seriously did NO ONE in the writer’s room raise their hand and go “Wait a second here maybe we should rethink this…”?)
  8. An ancient order that uses the blood of corrupted monsters of an unknown sinister origin to allow them to fight said monsters better.
  9. USING LAVA AS A LIGHT SOURCE WHERE YOU ARE IN AN ENCLOSED CAVE STANDING FIVE FEET AWAY FROM IT AND DOING JUST FINE.
  10. GIANT FUCKING SPIDERS SERIOUSLY I AM TALKING HUMMER SIZED
  11. Cutting people apart and stitching them back together frankenstein style and having that actually work.
  12. Giant gray-skinned horned people.

So, yes, OP. If you’re going “The fact that four bisexuals are in the same city and also hang out together, THAT’S what breaks my immersion” you might want to rethink your priorities. Sorry, but them’s the breaks. 

Also bisexuals huddle together for warmth and travel in packs. So. Yeah.

(via bisexual-books)

7PM

GUYS THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT PLEASE DON’T SCROLL PAST IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

not-quitenormal:

ask-cupcake-the-eevee:

furbearingbrick:

ereriislife15:

I’m doing a persuasive speech and this would really help me out.

If you think animals should be adopted from shelters, reblog.

If you think animals should be bought from pet stores, like.

*REBLOGS FURIOUSLY*

YES.

SHELTER ANIMALS

THE OLDER THE BETTER

(Source: the-martyr-from-gloria, via tribulationsarego)

7PM

"hiring entry level positions"

the-goddamazon:

taggediconic:

[username redacted]:

requirements: 10 years experience in space station repair, masters degree in ancient serbian civilizations, unmatched knowledge of silkworm breeding, full understanding of teleportation mechanics and physics

pay: $9.50/hour

Bonus: Part-Time/Seasonal Only.

(Source: gypped)

9AM

gymleaderkyle:

if youre in a heterosexual relationship like who gets to be the woman and who gets to be the other woman?

(via feministbatwoman)

9AM

frankoceanfanclub:

None of the Beatles should have been your fave fuck alla them

(via whitegirlsaintshit)

9AM

queermarcobodt:

"you’re too young to know what your sexuality is" said the straight person to a queer teenager 

"he’s such a ladies’ man" said the straight person about a 6 month old baby that doesn’t know what a lady is

(via feministbatwoman)

9AM
facebooksexism:

thegrumpywriter:

facebooksexism:

I didn’t bother to block this guy’s name or picture because he’s a piece of shit and deserves to be known for what he is. He’s no one I know nor is he on my facebook… he just trolls feminist pages I’m on._____Danny Morgan is a literal rape advocate. Take a good look at that face and beware! 

While I do agree that what this man said was wrong on several levels, I must inform you that not censoring his name is a crime almost everywhere, and you (and everybody else) should respect that

Ha! Oh noes, the internet police are a coming for me! I’d really love to see these laws you speak of, where showing what someone said on a public medium is illegal.

facebooksexism:

thegrumpywriter:

facebooksexism:

I didn’t bother to block this guy’s name or picture because he’s a piece of shit and deserves to be known for what he is. He’s no one I know nor is he on my facebook… he just trolls feminist pages I’m on.

_____

Danny Morgan is a literal rape advocate. Take a good look at that face and beware!

While I do agree that what this man said was wrong on several levels, I must inform you that not censoring his name is a crime almost everywhere, and you (and everybody else) should respect that

Ha! Oh noes, the internet police are a coming for me!

I’d really love to see these laws you speak of, where showing what someone said on a public medium is illegal.

9AM
“Seriously, women make 77 cents to a man’s dollar, but own only 36% as much wealth – and the wealth gap between men and women has widened even as the income gap slowly narrows. Women who never married own 6 percent of the wealth of their bachelor brothers. It gets worse: black and Latino never-married women own a penny for every dollar of wealth controlled by men of their race. And of course, women make up almost two out of three adults living in poverty. Since the capacity to make big political donations is a factor of having disposable wealth, not just income, the wealth gap between men and women is the crucial factor behind the donor gap. That’s the main reason “why women don’t give.”” Women donate less to political campaigns because they earn less money, not because they’re cheap or uninterested. (via salon)

(via gtfothinspo)

9AM

graceespooks:

the level at which rihanna doesnt give a fuck is so inspiring

(Source: graceebooks, via robowings)

← Older entries Page 1 of 827